New Jersey Injury Attorney Blog

Recent studies have shown that the use of some selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been linked to birth defects.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released its findings of two separate studies in 2005 that concluded that pregnant women using Paxil during their first trimester of pregnancy were at a higher risk of having a baby with cardiac problems, such as underdeveloped arteries. Since 2005, additional studies have shown that the use of SSRIs can be harmful to the fetus and cause serious complications such as heart, lung and brain or spinal cord irregularities, as well as the misshaping of the skull, abdominal wall and other body parts.

A more recent study published by the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology found that out of 12,700 babies born between 1997 and 2004, 54% of infants were born with a major heart defect after the mother reportedly used the drug Bupropion during the first trimester. .

Continue reading "Anti-Depressants May Cause Serious Personal Injury" »

Posted by Lependorf & Silverstein | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Product Liability

Bookmark:

A storage trunk that was sold by Target has seriously injured a child. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has claimed that “the lid of the trunk can drop suddenly when released, posing a strangulation hazard to small children opening or reaching into the trunks.” The CPSC has received two reports regarding this product, both involving injuries due to the lack of a proper mechanism that ensures that the lid stays propped open.

Earlier this year, a family sued Target and claimed that their 18-month-old child suffered brain trauma after the lid of the storage trunk collapsed on her head and cut of circulation and oxygen for an extended period of time. After the lawsuit was initiated, Target issued a recall for 350,000 of the “Woven Storage Trunks” that were distributed nationwide between February 2009 and April 2010.

Unfortunately, unsafe products are sold around the world every day, and many of them can cause serious injuries because of a malfunction or a design defect. If the product is misrepresented or gives the consumer a false sense of security, then the manufacturer can be held liable for any damages caused by the use of their product.

Continue reading "Target Recalls Unsafe Storage Trunks" »

Posted by Lependorf & Silverstein | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Product Liability

Bookmark:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has detected a rare strain of the E. Coli virus, which has been found in romaine lettuce. The New York State Public Health Laboratory, Wadsworth Center located in Albany, New York discovered the “E. Coli O145” virus.

The virus was detected on an unopened bag of shredded romaine lettuce from Freshway Foods, an Ohio based company. Freshway Foods has recalled various romaine lettuce products across the United States, including New Jersey.

The FDA has identified that the source of the contaminated lettuce was a farm in Yuma, Arizona, though no particular farm has been pinpointed as the culprit. After the initial recall by Freshway Foods, another food distributor in Moore, Oklahoma also issued a recall for its shredded romaine lettuce products, claiming that the product was also from the same farm in Yuma, Arizona.

Continue reading "Romaine Lettuce Causes E. Coli Outbreak" »

Posted by Lependorf & Silverstein | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Product Liability

Bookmark:

Each year, many products are recalled because they are defective and hazardous. Recently, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced that certain brands of hooded, sleeveless girls’ vests were recalled because the drawstrings posed potential risk for strangulation.

In 1996, the CPSC Office of Compliance issued guidelines for the clothing industry to follow in order to reduce the risks involved with the design of the clothing. Almost 50 non-fatal incidents and 22 fatal incidents were reported between 1985 and 1999, all involving drawstrings on children’s clothing.

Luckily, no incidents with the hooded, sleeveless vests have been reported. However, as of 2006, the CPSC announced that any children’s clothing items that had drawstrings around the hood or neck would be categorized as defective in order to prevent accidental strangulations.

People use unsafe products in New Jersey and throughout the U.S. every day, and the risks involved are often serious, if not life threatening. If the product is misrepresented or gives the consumer a false sense of security, then the manufacturer might be held liable for any damages caused by the use of their product.

If you or a loved one has suffered an injury in New Jersey due to a defective product, you may be entitled to compensation. The experienced Princeton product liability attorneys at Lependorf & Silverstein have represented numerous clients and have acquired favorable settlements and verdicts in product liability cases. For a free and confidential evaluation, call Lependorf & Silverstein at (609) 240-0040 today.

Posted by Lependorf & Silverstein | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Product Liability

Bookmark:

After an unfortunate sequence of fatal food-borne illness outbreaks involving various food products ranging from peanuts to cookie dough to spinach, a Senate bill, the Food Safety Modernization Act, has recently been approved. However, according to nj.com, even though the bill to refurbish the FDA’s food safety system was unanimously accepted, it may not receive a floor vote until 2010. This may be partly due to the issue of funding for the food safety reform, which would drastically improve and increase Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory powers.

The chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee says the new FDA program may cost almost $4 billion over a period of five years. Considering that the FDA safeguards approximately 80% of the U.S. food supply, which includes imports from over 200 countries, there is no doubt that this bill will greatly help their efforts and is worth the cost.

The reformed safety program would allow the FDA the ability to order a food recall rather than force them to wait for a producer to respond to a recall request. The Senate Bill will also enforce more regulated inspections, especially for high-risk facilities. If passed in 2010, this will be the first major food safety reform since the Great Depression.

Continue reading "Federal FDA Food Safety System Still in the Works" »

Posted by Lependorf & Silverstein | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Law & Information , Personal Injury , Product Liability

Bookmark:

Auto accident victims who claim they have been injured as a result of auto product defects in New Jersey and across the nation from Chrysler and General Motors vehicles are being left high and dry because of the auto makers' bankruptcy filings. According to this news report, consumers and consumer advocates are outraged that auto makers, that are being financed by tax payers, are throwing "consumer safety protections out the window."

The bankruptcy of Chrysler and GM has led to new complications, particularly with regard to product liability lawsuits. According to several consumer advocates, the car companies will back up their warranties for auto parts, but will not take responsibility for personal injuries caused by defective auto parts. So, for example, if your brakes are bad, they'll fix them. But if you crash and get seriously injured because of defective brakes, then your auto maker (Chrysler or GM) won't be held liable for that.

Auto product defects are more common than we know or hear about every day. Thousands of auto accidents occur nationwide and in New Jersey because of defective auto products such as tires, airbags, seatbelts, seatbacks, engines and steering. Defective design of a vehicle can also cause catastrophic injuries or deaths in an auto accident.

Continue reading "GM and Chrysler Bankruptcies Affect Auto Product Liability Lawsuits" »

Posted by Lependorf & Silverstein | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Auto Accidents , Auto Product Liability , Defective Products , Personal Injury , Product Liability

Bookmark:

If your company sells commercial goods to other businesses for resale, fabrication, or use in other products, you should make certain that your warranty disclaimers are well written, properly communicated, and otherwise enforceable. One of the most important disclaimers you should consider is a limitation of consequential damages.

When drafting warranty disclaimers, businesses must strike a balance. On the one hand, you want to protect yourself themselves from possible New Jersey products liability flowing from the product sold. On the other hand, you want to assure potential customers that you stand behind your product. An attorney who is familiar with your business is essential to drafting effective and enforceable warranty and liability disclaimers.

While the number of ways to limit potential liability is virtually infinite, probably the most important protection is to limit “consequential damages.” In plain English, the concept of consequential damages is as follows. Typically, a business claiming a breach of contract can recover the total contract price, or a fraction thereof, depending on the circumstances. For example, Buyer agrees to pay $100 for Seller’s product. After paying for it, the product does not work. If Seller cannot or will not replace or repair the product, Buyer would be entitled to $100 in direct damages for the breach.

Continue reading "Products Liability and Warranty Protected With Well Written Disclaimer" »

Posted by Lependorf & Silverstein | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Product Liability

Bookmark: